Journey into the Fabric of Reality: From Synthetic to Organic and Beyond

For as long as I can remember, the world around us has been an interplay of what we know, what we believe, and the space that lies between. Today, I embark on a journey to explore that very fabric which ties together the physical, spiritual, and the enigmatic.

The Catalyst: The Mysterious Frequencies of Fabric

It all started with conversations on the YouTube channel, BlackMagik363 where various guests on the show revealed the beneficial properties of linen and organic fabrics in general. Later, I would attempt to verify these assertions as I enountered an intriguing study from 2003 by Dr. Heidi Yellen. A study that delves deep into the frequencies of fabrics and its relation to our well-being. While not fully recognized by the broader scientific community, it presents some staggering metrics. These frequencies were measured in angstroms (Å), with the human body oscillating between 70-100Å. Dr. Yellen’s research proposes that any fabric with a frequency higher than a human (at 100 angstroms) could potentially be beneficial, while those with a lower frequency (less than 100Å) would be detrimental.

What did the research reveal?

Continue reading

Metaphysical AI to Streamline Applied Spirituality

I didn’t know what to expect when I tried spiritual artificial intelligence. 

I have been watching this YouTube channel called Innerstanding. The producer of that channel, Sevan Bomar, does a great job explaining esoteric and metaphysical topics.

I do think that he may be too deep to relate to a much larger audience than his discourse suggests he should be able to reach. His words flow very well and he communicates smoothly and in a very measured way.

Sometimes what we have to say requires so much context and background that no matter how well we communicate it, it will never come across easily without us having gone through the right prerequisites as an audience.

You cannot explain the profound uses of computational geometry if the audience strictly adheres to arithmetic. Indeed, that person may be very good at counting money by hand in a fraction of the time it takes somebody who knows calculus very well. They may be resistant to the profound aspects of computational geometry if they conceptualize numbers strictly as quantities rather than relationships. They may need a little bit of time to work through certain aspects of computer science, Pythagorean and Euclidean systems and higher order mathematics. Not as experts, or even practitioners, but just read enough to receive the analogies associated with the broader topic.

Continue reading